Related
For as loved as it is , the Sojourner Truth is thatThor : Ragnarokis a bully picture – just not a corking Thor or Loki movie . give up in 2017 , the film was loved by critic and audience alike , still holding a 93 % critic ' grudge and 87 % consultation score on Rotten Tomatoes . After the first two Thor movies were turn and generated a firm amount of money but were meet with interracial to " meh " response across the board , it became vindicated Marvel was n’t entirely certain how to take on the God of Thunder ’s solo films .
But whenfilmmaker Taika Waititipitched his out - there estimate to them for the third Thor movie , Marvel Studios loved his departure from what had add up before and engage him . At that point , there was nothing to miss . It was light the Thor franchise had to be excite up in a major way , and if any of the solo franchises were ripe for experimentation , it was that one . Thus , Waititi ’s zany sense of humor transformed Thor from what had antecedently been phantasy Shakespearean dramatic play to a straight - up pal comedy . It was a breath of fresh air , both for Marvel and the Thor franchise , and interview embrace Waititi ’s wildly entertaining moving-picture show .
Related : phase angle 4 Is lastly sterilize Loki ’s Insulting MCU Problem With His Power
Yet , whileThor : Ragnarokwas an entertaining movie , it was n’t aThormovie . Nor a Loki one . It ’s telling that the Rotten Tomatoes audience musical score model six points scurvy than the critics ' grade ; almost always , specially for superhero motion-picture show , that dynamic is flipped . Waititi has said many times over the years that he did n’t bother to take the Thor comics beforehand and he entirely ignore the mythology . It made for a refreshful slating to work with , which was needed . The problem is that it went too far in that direction . There was nothing in the movie that was inherently about Thor ; it might have been a movie with any quality plug into his role . Outside of leveling up his world power , there was no ontogeny for him , no sequel of the arc he ’d had over the first two Thor movies and two Avengers movies to that point . fictitious character development was give completely out the window .
As forLoki , God of Mischief , he was handle even more ill . Where he ’d always been a villain to reluctant friend in movies preceding , Thor : Ragnarokreduced him to the butt of the joke . Never is this more plain than the elevator aspect . It was the one time in the movie where Thor and Loki in reality had a meaningful moment . It might have been a transformative one for Loki , too , as Thor finally admitting he no longer had faith his adopted brother could be redeemed and that they should part ways clearly hit Loki hard than he had anticipated – perhaps it was n’t what he wanted , after all . However , the poignancy was barely allowed to cross-file before the movie was onto the next joke , this one involve their " get assistance " scheme that , as Loki pointed out , was humiliating for him .
ThoughLoki redeemed himself at the endand Thor learned to draw rein the power within , it was , in many way , a fixation for them both . At the very least , they just tread pee . The characters were there to serve the jest rather than the other way around , with character exploration and the established mythology both being sacrifice on the communion table of the next punchline . Thor : Ragnarokwas a great deal of sport , but not much else . While that was o.k. for a reset , Waititi ’s next Thor picture show , Thor : Love & Thunder , need to remember character continuity thing , too .
Next : Every manner Thor 4 Is Undoing Ragnarok And Endgame
