Thor: Ragnarok
From the firstThormovie toAvengers : Age of Ultron , Thor was nigh to a one - note of hand character who , while resemble the looking and personality of comic book Thor , was not as compelling as other Avengers like Iron Man or even the Hulk . That quickly changed inRagnarok , as the movie found a combination of humourous and kind - hearted quality that perfectly fit the quality . Thor : Ragnarokalso insert Valkyrie and Korg , both of which returned in other motion-picture show , and it gave the Hulk the closest matter to a solo film since 2008’sThe unbelievable Hulk .
Related : Odin Secretly Hinted At Ragnarok ’s Hela Twist In 2011 ’s Thor Movie
It is , in fact , Hulk ’s part inThor : Ragnarokthat made the moving picture so significant for the future of the MCU , as it proved that two or more hero could share a solo film . Captain America : Civil Warhad done something similar , but the 2016 film was closer to being an Avengers picture show than a solo yield . Ragnarok , on the other hand , introduced the mind of solo MCU films starring not only the main zep but also one or two major characters from the franchise in a prominent role . That approach would convert the future of the MCU .
Why Hulk’s Role In Thor: Ragnarok Was So Huge
Hulk / Bruce Banner had a considerable amount of silver screen time inRagnarok , and he was far from being just a glorified cameo as Iron Man was inSpider - Man : Homecoming . This fresh dynamic between two major MCU characters share a solo film worked so well inRagnarokthat it was carried to other picture show in the franchise , namelySpider - serviceman and Doctor StrangeinSpider - Man : No Way place ; Doctor Strange and Wanda inDoctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness , Thor with the Guardians and Jane Foster inThor : Love and Thunder , and Carol Danvers teaming up with Kamala Khan and Monic Rambeau inThe Marvels .
The MCU has grow to the head where solo films can sometimes be seen as smaller - plate movies , peculiarly afterAvengers : Infinity WarandAvengers : Endgame , which is why this novel style of team - up films is so important . Ragnarokproved that two bountiful quality can share one movie , and that the Avengers movies are not the only place a superhero team - up can happen . Obviously , Thor was the independent character inRagnarok , but theHulk ’s Ragnarok arcwas also important , and would be carry ontoInfinity WarandEndgame . That said , find that balance is not always loose , as proved by Scarlet Witch ’s narration being almost the most important emotional arc ofDoctor Strange 2 . In any pillow slip , the consultation ' expectations for teams and cameos , even in solo pic , is something that Marvel will have to care with , especially now the MCU is embracing the multiverse .
Thor : Love and Thunderseem to be continuing everything that made the first Taika Waititi movie so special , but it is the proved - successful strategy of two heroes sharing a solo film that is the true MCU bequest ofThor : Ragnarok . Currently , MCU picture starring just one superhero are becoming more the exception than the rule . It will be interesting to see if that will be a Phase 4 phenomenon only , or if it will be carry onto the MCU Phase 5 and beyond .
Next : Thor : Love & Thunder ’s Villain Is Retconning Ragnarok ’s Hela
